Theft Crimes Attorney

Theft Crimes Defense Attorney in Suffolk County, New York

Being charged with theft crimes in Suffolk County can result in serious criminal penalties including jail time, substantial fines, restitution payments, permanent criminal records, and consequences that affect your employment, professional licenses, and future opportunities. Theft offenses range from shoplifting and petty larceny to grand larceny involving hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars. These charges can be prosecuted as misdemeanors or serious felonies depending on the value of property taken and the circumstances of the offense. Attorney Michael Brown is Suffolk County’s most experienced theft crimes defense lawyer, with a proven track record of successfully defending clients against all types of theft charges.

MichaelBrownTheftCrimesAttorneySuffolkCounty

Understanding Theft Crimes Under New York Law

Theft crimes in New York are primarily prosecuted under Article 155 of the New York Penal Law, which addresses larceny offenses. New York uses the term “larceny” rather than “theft,” but the crimes encompass what is commonly understood as theft, stealing, shoplifting, embezzlement, and related offenses.

Larceny is defined as wrongfully taking, obtaining, or withholding property from its owner with intent to deprive the owner of the property or to appropriate it for yourself or a third party. The severity of larceny charges depends primarily on the value of the property taken, with specific thresholds determining whether charges are misdemeanors or various degrees of felonies.

Petit Larceny

Petit Larceny, under New York Penal Law § 155.25, is a Class A misdemeanor and the least serious larceny charge. A person is guilty of petit larceny when they steal property valued at $1,000 or less.

Petit larceny encompasses a wide range of theft scenarios including:

Shoplifting merchandise valued under $1,000
Stealing cash or personal property under $1,000
Taking property from another person
Theft from employers
Stealing from vehicles

Penalties:

Jail Time: Up to one year in county jail
Probation: Up to three years of probation
Fines: Up to $1,000 plus mandatory surcharges
Restitution: Full payment to victims for stolen property
Criminal Record: Permanent misdemeanor conviction on your record
Employment Consequences: Criminal record affecting job applications and professional licenses
Immigration Consequences: Potential deportation for non-citizens, as theft crimes are often considered “crimes involving moral turpitude”

While petit larceny is “only” a misdemeanor, the consequences are still significant, particularly for individuals in positions of trust, those with professional licenses, and non-citizens facing immigration consequences.

Grand Larceny

Grand larceny charges are felonies that apply when stolen property exceeds $1,000 in value or involves specific types of property. Grand larceny is divided into four degrees based on the value of property taken.

Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree

Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, under New York Penal Law § 155.30, is a Class E felony. A person is guilty when they steal property and:

The property exceeds $1,000 in value, or
The property consists of a public record, or
The property consists of secret scientific material, or
The property consists of a credit or debit card, or
The property is taken from the person of another (regardless of value), or
The property consists of an access device which the person intends to use unlawfully, or
The property consists of ammonia or anhydrous ammonia in a container and the intent is to use it to manufacture methamphetamine, or
The property is obtained by extortion

The most common basis for fourth-degree grand larceny is theft of property exceeding $1,000 in value.

Penalties:

Prison Time: Up to 4 years in state prison
Probation: Possible probation for first-time offenders
Fines: Up to $5,000 plus mandatory surcharges
Restitution: Full payment to victims for losses
Permanent Felony Record: A felony conviction affecting employment, housing, professional licenses, voting rights (while incarcerated), and firearm possession
Immigration Consequences: High likelihood of deportation for non-citizens

Grand Larceny in the Third Degree

Grand Larceny in the Third Degree, under New York Penal Law § 155.35, is a Class D felony. A person is guilty when they steal property and the value of the property exceeds $3,000.

This charge applies to thefts of property valued between $3,000 and $50,000.

Penalties:

Prison Time: 2 to 7 years in state prison
Probation: Possible in limited circumstances for first-time offenders
Fines: Up to $5,000 plus surcharges
Restitution: Full payment of victim losses
Permanent Felony Record: Serious felony conviction with lasting consequences
Immigration Consequences: Very high likelihood of deportation for non-citizens

Grand Larceny in the Second Degree

Grand Larceny in the Second Degree, under New York Penal Law § 155.40, is a Class C felony. A person is guilty when they steal property and:

The value of the property exceeds $50,000, or
The property is obtained by extortion committed by instilling fear that the actor or another will (1) cause physical injury to some person in the future, (2) cause damage to property, (3) use or abuse their position as a public servant, or (4) perform any other act calculated to harm another person materially

This charge typically applies to thefts of property valued between $50,000 and $1,000,000, or to serious extortion cases.

Penalties:

Prison Time: 3.5 to 15 years in state prison
Mandatory Sentencing: Limited probation eligibility
Fines: Up to $5,000 plus substantial surcharges
Restitution: Full payment of all losses
Permanent Serious Felony Record: Class C felony with devastating consequences
Immigration Consequences: Nearly certain deportation for non-citizens

Grand Larceny in the First Degree

Grand Larceny in the First Degree, under New York Penal Law § 155.42, is a Class B felony—the most serious larceny charge in New York. A person is guilty when they steal property and the value of the property exceeds $1,000,000.

This charge applies to large-scale thefts, embezzlement schemes, and fraud involving property valued over one million dollars.

Penalties:

Prison Time: 5 to 25 years in state prison
Mandatory Prison Sentence: Significant mandatory minimum prison time
Massive Fines: Up to $5,000 plus extensive surcharges
Restitution: Full payment of losses, potentially millions of dollars
Permanent Serious Felony Record: Class B felony conviction permanently destroying career and life opportunities
Immigration Consequences: Certain deportation for non-citizens

Aggravated Grand Larceny

New York law provides enhanced charges for larceny involving automated teller machines (ATMs).

Aggravated Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree

Under New York Penal Law § 155.43, this Class E felony occurs when someone commits grand larceny in the fourth degree and the property consists of an automated teller machine or its contents.

Penalties:

Prison Time: Up to 4 years
Fines: Up to $5,000
Restitution: Full payment
Permanent Felony Record

Aggravated Grand Larceny in the Third Degree

Under New York Penal Law § 155.44, this Class D felony occurs when someone commits grand larceny in the third degree and the property consists of an automated teller machine or its contents.

Penalties:

Prison Time: 2 to 7 years
Fines: Up to $5,000
Restitution: Full payment
Permanent Felony Record

Types of Theft Crimes

Shoplifting

Shoplifting is one of the most common theft offenses and is prosecuted under the general larceny statutes. Shoplifting involves:

Taking merchandise from stores without paying
Altering price tags to pay less than retail value
Switching containers or packaging to pay less
Removing security tags or devices
Concealing merchandise with intent to leave without paying

Shoplifting charges range from petit larceny (merchandise under $1,000) to various degrees of grand larceny depending on the value of goods taken. Repeat shoplifting offenses and organized retail theft operations can result in enhanced charges and penalties.

Embezzlement

While New York doesn’t have a separate embezzlement statute, embezzlement is prosecuted as larceny. Embezzlement involves wrongfully taking property that was lawfully entrusted to you, commonly occurring in employment contexts where employees steal from employers.

Common embezzlement scenarios include:

Taking money from cash registers or company accounts
Forging checks or authorizing fraudulent payments
Stealing inventory or equipment
Manipulating accounting records to conceal theft
Diverting company funds for personal use

Embezzlement is particularly serious because it involves breach of trust and often occurs over extended periods, resulting in substantial losses that trigger high-degree grand larceny charges.

Employee Theft

Employee theft encompasses various forms of stealing from employers including:

Cash theft from registers or safes
Stealing merchandise or inventory
Time theft (falsifying hours worked)
Taking company property, equipment, or supplies
Stealing customer property
Identity theft using customer or company information

Employee theft cases often involve workplace investigations before criminal charges are filed, and employers may pursue both criminal prosecution and civil remedies.

Theft from Motor Vehicles

Stealing property from vehicles is prosecuted as larceny, with the degree depending on the value of property taken. Common scenarios include:

Stealing GPS devices, stereos, or electronics from cars
Taking tools, equipment, or packages from vehicles
Stealing purses, wallets, or personal items left in cars
Taking catalytic converters or vehicle parts

Receiving Stolen Property

While larceny involves stealing property, New York also criminalizes receiving, possessing, or disposing of stolen property.

Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the Fifth Degree (Class A misdemeanor): Knowingly possessing stolen property with intent to benefit yourself or someone other than the owner

Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the Fourth Degree (Class E felony): Possessing stolen property with value exceeding $1,000

Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the Third Degree (Class D felony): Possessing stolen property with value exceeding $3,000

Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the Second Degree (Class C felony): Possessing stolen property with value exceeding $50,000

Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the First Degree (Class B felony): Possessing stolen property with value exceeding $1,000,000

These charges apply to individuals who buy, receive, or possess property knowing it was stolen, even if they didn’t steal it themselves.

Theft of Services

Under New York Penal Law § 165.15, Theft of Services occurs when a person obtains services knowing they will avoid payment. This includes:

Leaving restaurants without paying (dine and dash)
Obtaining cable or internet service without authorization
Using utilities without paying
Obtaining hotel accommodations without paying
Riding public transportation without paying

Theft of services is typically charged based on the value of services obtained, ranging from violations to felonies.

Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle

Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle, under New York Penal Law § 165.05 and § 165.06, involves taking or using a vehicle without the owner’s consent:

Third Degree (Class A misdemeanor): Using a vehicle knowing you lack authorization

Second Degree (Class E felony): Committing unauthorized use with prior convictions or using the vehicle in connection with other crimes

First Degree (Class D felony): Using the vehicle for 24 hours or more, or causing damage exceeding $1,500

Extortion

Extortion, sometimes called blackmail, involves obtaining property through threats or coercion. New York Penal Law § 155.05 defines extortion as compelling or inducing another person to deliver property by instilling fear that the actor will:

Cause physical injury
Cause damage to property
Engage in other conduct harmful to the victim
Accuse someone of a crime
Expose a secret or publicize embarrassing information
Cause a strike or boycott
Abuse a position as a public servant

Extortion is prosecuted as grand larceny in various degrees depending on the value of property obtained and the specific threats made.

Long-Term Consequences of Theft Convictions

Employment Devastation

Theft convictions create severe employment barriers:

Employers routinely conduct background checks and automatically disqualify applicants with theft convictions
Positions involving money, inventory, or trust are permanently unavailable
Financial services, retail, banking, and accounting industries are essentially closed
Professional licenses may be revoked or denied
Security clearances become impossible to obtain
Government employment is difficult or impossible
Career advancement in current positions may be blocked

Theft convictions are particularly damaging because they suggest dishonesty and untrustworthiness—characteristics that make employers unwilling to hire or retain employees.

Professional Licensing Consequences

Theft convictions affect numerous professional licenses:

Accounting and Finance: CPAs, financial advisors, and accountants lose licenses
Legal Profession: Attorneys face disbarment or suspension
Real Estate: Real estate agents and brokers lose licenses
Healthcare: Medical professionals may face license suspension or revocation
Education: Teachers and administrators face license consequences
Insurance: Insurance agents and brokers lose licenses
Securities: Brokers and investment advisors are permanently barred

Many licensing boards view theft convictions as demonstrating moral unfitness for licensed professions.

Immigration Consequences

For non-citizens, theft convictions have serious immigration consequences:

Theft crimes are often classified as “crimes involving moral turpitude” under immigration law
Crimes involving moral turpitude can trigger deportation proceedings
Multiple theft convictions or theft involving substantial loss amounts may constitute “aggravated felonies”
Aggravated felonies result in mandatory deportation with virtually no relief available
Pending naturalization applications are denied
Legal permanent residents may lose their status
Re-entry to the United States becomes difficult or impossible

Even misdemeanor petit larceny convictions can have severe immigration consequences depending on circumstances.

Housing Difficulties

Theft convictions create housing obstacles:

Private landlords routinely deny rental applications from individuals with theft convictions
Public housing authorities may exclude applicants with criminal records
Many apartment complexes and residential communities have policies against renting to individuals with theft convictions
Background checks reveal convictions to potential landlords
Co-op boards and condo associations may deny applications

Financial Consequences

Beyond criminal penalties, theft convictions cause:

Restitution payments to victims that can amount to thousands or millions of dollars
Civil lawsuits from victims seeking additional damages
Difficulty obtaining loans, credit cards, or mortgages
Garnishment of wages for restitution payments
Collection actions and judgments
Financial instability from legal fees, fines, and restitution

Educational Consequences

Theft convictions affect education:

College admissions offices consider criminal history
Current students may face disciplinary action or expulsion
Federal financial aid eligibility may be affected
Professional and graduate school programs often exclude applicants with theft convictions
Academic opportunities become limited

Bonding and Surety Issues

Many positions require bonding or surety bonds:

Theft convictions make obtaining bonds difficult or impossible
Bonding companies refuse to provide surety for individuals with theft convictions
This eliminates career opportunities in many fields including finance, contracting, and positions handling money

Social and Reputational Consequences

Theft convictions carry social stigma:

Damaged reputation in communities and professional circles
Strained family relationships
Social isolation and judgment
Difficulty forming new personal and professional relationships
Permanent digital record easily discovered through background checks
Media coverage in some cases

Loss of Rights

Felony theft convictions result in:

Loss of voting rights while incarcerated (restored after release in New York)
Ineligibility to serve on juries
Prohibition on firearm possession for felony convictions
Disqualification from holding certain public offices

Common Defenses to Theft Charges

As Suffolk County’s most experienced theft crimes defense attorney, Michael Brown employs comprehensive defense strategies:

Lack of Intent to Steal

Larceny requires intent to permanently deprive the owner of property. Attorney Brown can demonstrate:

You intended to borrow the property temporarily
You believed the property was yours or you had a right to it
You intended to pay for the property
The taking was accidental or mistaken
You lacked the specific intent required for larceny

Intent is a critical element, and without proof of criminal intent, larceny charges should be dismissed.

Claim of Right

If you took property believing in good faith that you had a legal right to it, this can be a complete defense. Attorney Brown establishes:

You believed the property was yours
You had a legitimate claim to the property
The taking was based on a good faith belief in your right to the property
Disputes over property ownership negate criminal intent

This defense often arises in disputes between business partners, family members, or parties to contracts.

Mistaken Identity

Theft cases often involve identification issues. Attorney Brown challenges:

Whether you were actually the person who committed the theft
Reliability of witness identifications
Quality of surveillance footage
Lack of physical evidence linking you to the theft
Alibi evidence placing you elsewhere

In shoplifting cases, store security and employees sometimes misidentify shoppers as thieves.

Lack of Knowledge (Receiving Stolen Property)

For charges of criminal possession of stolen property, prosecutors must prove you knew the property was stolen. Attorney Brown demonstrates:

You had no knowledge the property was stolen
You purchased the property from a seemingly legitimate source
The circumstances didn’t suggest the property was stolen
You acted in good faith
Prosecution cannot prove knowledge beyond reasonable doubt

False Accusations

Sometimes theft allegations are fabricated or exaggerated:

Former employees are falsely accused by employers
Disputes between parties lead to false theft claims
Individuals make false reports for insurance purposes or other motives
Misunderstandings are characterized as theft

Attorney Brown investigates false accusation scenarios and presents evidence of accusers’ motives to lie.

Insufficient Evidence

Attorney Brown demonstrates:

Prosecution evidence is insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt
Circumstantial evidence doesn’t support conviction
Witnesses lack credibility
Physical evidence doesn’t prove you committed the theft
Reasonable doubt exists

Consent

If you had permission to take the property, this negates the wrongful taking element. Attorney Brown establishes:

The owner consented to you taking the property
You had authorization to possess or use the property
Misunderstandings about permission negate criminal liability

Value Disputes

The degree of larceny charges depends on property value. Attorney Brown challenges:

Prosecution’s valuation of stolen property
Whether property was worth what prosecutors claim
Whether proper valuation methods were used
Whether values were inflated

Successfully challenging property values can result in charges being reduced from higher to lower degrees of larceny.

Constitutional Challenges

Attorney Brown examines whether:

Searches were conducted lawfully
Evidence was obtained constitutionally
Your statements were obtained in violation of Miranda rights
Your constitutional rights were violated at any stage
Evidence should be suppressed

Entrapment

In sting operations or cases involving confidential informants, Attorney Brown may argue:

You were entrapped by law enforcement
Police induced criminal conduct you wouldn’t otherwise have engaged in
You lacked predisposition to commit theft

Civil Compromise

In some cases, Attorney Brown negotiates:

Restitution to victims in exchange for dropped charges
Civil settlements resolving both criminal and civil claims
Agreements where victims decline to prosecute

Negotiating Reduced Charges

Even in challenging cases, Attorney Brown’s experience often results in:

Reduction from felony to misdemeanor charges
Reduction from higher to lower degrees of larceny
Reduction from larceny to lesser offenses
Adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (ACD), resulting in eventual dismissal
Plea agreements avoiding jail time
Conditional discharge or probation instead of incarceration
Agreements minimizing immigration consequences
Resolutions protecting professional licenses

Five Reasons Attorney Michael Brown Is Your Best Choice for Theft Crimes Defense

Unmatched Experience in Theft Crime Cases: As Suffolk County’s most experienced theft crimes defense attorney, Michael Brown has successfully defended hundreds of clients against theft charges ranging from shoplifting and petit larceny to complex embezzlement schemes and grand larceny in the first degree involving millions of dollars. His extensive experience with every type of theft case—including employee theft, retail theft, receiving stolen property, theft by extortion, and financial fraud—provides clients with sophisticated defense strategies based on decades of successful outcomes.
Strategic Understanding of Value Calculations and Charge Reduction: The degree of larceny charges depends entirely on property value, and even small differences in valuation can mean the difference between misdemeanor and felony charges or between lower and higher degree felonies. Attorney Brown has extensive experience challenging prosecution valuations, presenting evidence of lower property values, negotiating with prosecutors over value calculations, and achieving charge reductions by demonstrating property was worth less than alleged. His expertise in value disputes has resulted in countless charge reductions that dramatically decreased clients’ sentencing exposure.
Expertise in Employment-Related Theft Cases: Employee theft and embezzlement cases involve unique dynamics including employer investigations, internal audit evidence, accounting records, and workplace relationships. Attorney Brown has extensive experience defending employees accused of theft, challenging employer allegations, demonstrating lack of intent or authorization defenses, exposing false accusations by employers seeking to avoid unemployment claims or civil liability, and protecting employees’ rights throughout internal investigations and criminal proceedings. His understanding of employment law and workplace dynamics enhances his criminal defense strategies.
Comprehensive Approach to Immigration Consequences: Theft convictions constitute “crimes involving moral turpitude” that trigger deportation for non-citizens, making immigration consequences a critical consideration in theft cases. Attorney Brown structures defenses specifically to avoid or minimize immigration consequences, negotiates resolutions that may avoid deportation triggers, coordinates with immigration attorneys, and understands which plea agreements protect immigration status. His comprehensive approach addresses both criminal liability and immigration consequences that can be more devastating than criminal sentences.
Protection of Professional Licenses and Career: Theft convictions often result in automatic professional license revocation or denial in fields involving trust, money, or fiduciary responsibilities. Attorney Brown understands collateral consequences for professional licenses and structures defenses to minimize career damage, negotiates resolutions that may allow license retention, coordinates criminal defense with professional licensing proceedings, and fights to protect clients’ ability to continue their careers. His strategic approach addresses not just criminal penalties but professional and career consequences that extend far beyond sentences.

The Critical Importance of Immediate Representation

Theft cases require immediate legal intervention. Contact Attorney Michael Brown right away because:

Preventing Damaging Statements: People accused of theft often try to explain themselves to police, store security, or employers, making statements that become devastating evidence. Attorney Brown ensures you exercise your right to remain silent and don’t inadvertently provide evidence against you.

Civil Demand Letters: Retailers often send civil demand letters demanding payment for alleged shoplifting. Attorney Brown advises how to handle these demands without admitting guilt or providing evidence for criminal prosecution.

Employer Investigations: Employee theft cases often involve employer investigations before criminal charges. Early legal intervention can protect your rights during workplace investigations and potentially prevent criminal prosecution.

Evidence Preservation: Surveillance footage, witness statements, receipts, and other evidence must be preserved quickly. Attorney Brown acts immediately to preserve exculpatory evidence.

Restitution Negotiations: Early restitution to victims can sometimes result in charges being reduced or dismissed. Attorney Brown negotiates strategically to achieve favorable outcomes.

Asset Protection: Some theft cases involve asset seizure or civil lawsuits. Early intervention protects your assets and coordinates criminal defense with civil matters.

Immigration Protection: If you’re not a U.S. citizen, immediate legal advice is critical to structure your defense to minimize deportation risk.

Professional License Protection: If you hold professional licenses, immediate action may prevent automatic suspension pending criminal proceedings.

Understanding Civil Remedies and Consequences

Theft crimes often trigger civil consequences beyond criminal prosecution:

Civil Demand Laws

New York General Obligations Law § 11-105 allows retailers to send civil demand letters to alleged shoplifters demanding payment (typically $75-$500) plus the value of merchandise. These civil demands are separate from criminal charges.

Important: Paying civil demands doesn’t prevent criminal prosecution and can be construed as admission of guilt. Attorney Brown advises on handling civil demands strategically.

Civil Lawsuits

Victims of theft can file civil lawsuits seeking:

Return of stolen property
Monetary damages for loss
Punitive damages
Attorney fees
Interest and costs

Civil cases proceed independently of criminal cases, and criminal convictions can be used as evidence in civil proceedings.

Treble Damages

Some theft cases allow victims to recover treble (triple) damages under various civil statutes, dramatically increasing financial liability.

What to Do If You’re Charged with Theft

If you’ve been arrested, accused, or are under investigation for theft:

Immediately Exercise Your Right to Remain Silent: Do not answer questions from police, store security, loss prevention personnel, or employers. Do not try to explain, apologize, or provide your version of events. State: “I want to speak with my attorney and I am exercising my right to remain silent.”

Do Not Sign Anything: Do not sign statements, confessions, admissions, civil demand forms, or any documents without first consulting an attorney. Signatures can be used as admissions of guilt.

Request an Attorney Immediately: If questioned, clearly invoke your right to counsel: “I want an attorney.”

Do Not Return to the Store or Scene: If accused of shoplifting or theft from a business, do not return to the location or attempt to explain or apologize. Any contact can result in additional evidence against you.

Do Not Contact Alleged Victims: Do not attempt to make restitution, apologize, or contact victims without first consulting your attorney. These contacts can be used as admissions of guilt.

Preserve Evidence: If you have receipts, proof of purchase, surveillance footage, witness information, or other evidence supporting your innocence, preserve it immediately and provide it only to your attorney.

Do Not Discuss Your Case: Don’t talk about your case with anyone except your attorney—not family members, friends, coworkers, or others. These conversations are not privileged and can be used against you.

Do Not Pay Civil Demands Without Legal Advice: If you receive civil demand letters from retailers, do not pay them without first consulting Attorney Michael Brown. Payment can be used as evidence of guilt in criminal proceedings.

Document Everything: Write down everything you remember about the incident, including witnesses, your state of mind, circumstances, and any evidence supporting your innocence. Provide this only to your attorney.

Contact Attorney Michael Brown Immediately: Theft cases move quickly and carry serious consequences including jail time, criminal records, restitution obligations, and collateral consequences affecting employment, professional licenses, and immigration status. Early legal intervention can make the difference between conviction and dismissal. Attorney Brown needs to begin immediately preserving evidence, investigating circumstances, protecting your rights, and developing your defense strategy.

Your Future and Reputation Are at Stake

Theft convictions carry unique stigma because they suggest dishonesty and untrustworthiness—characteristics that affect every aspect of your life. Beyond criminal penalties, theft convictions can end careers, destroy reputations, result in deportation, and create barriers to employment and housing that last a lifetime.

But theft charges are defensible. Many theft cases are based on misunderstandings, lack of criminal intent, false accusations, or insufficient evidence. Property value disputes can reduce charge severity. Constitutional violations can result in evidence suppression. Authorization and consent defenses can defeat charges entirely. Every theft case deserves aggressive, strategic defense.

You need Suffolk County’s most experienced theft crimes defense lawyer—someone who has successfully defended hundreds of theft cases, who understands the nuances of intent requirements and valuation disputes, who can negotiate favorable charge reductions, who knows how to protect professional licenses and immigration status, and who will fight tirelessly to protect your freedom, your reputation, your career, and your future.

Contact Attorney Michael Brown today for a confidential consultation about your theft case. Time is critical. Don’t let a theft charge destroy your reputation, end your career, or result in deportation. Don’t make statements to police or sign anything without first consulting an experienced attorney. Early action and strategic representation can make all the difference. Let Suffolk County’s most experienced theft crimes defense attorney put his expertise, his experience, and his unwavering commitment to work protecting you and fighting for the best possible outcome in your case.